[Error: unknown template qotd]
Plenty of my favourite books have been adapted. the results vary. my favourite adaptation is the 200 5 version of Pride and Prejudice. everything about it is a close to perfect as you can get. ELizabeth and Darcy are hot, the right age, fit the part, have loads of chemistry, all the actors fit their characters very well, the costumes are right, the photography is amazing, the music is brilliant, it stays close to the book without being a carbon copy and it has its own life, its own spirit, it stands on its own.
there are plenty of good austen adaptations. and some quite not so good. and others that are a different animal like lost in austen and p&P:a latter day comedy

I love Harry POtter but the films always disappoint me. and even though the movie is kind of a mess,really, I love Prisoner of Azkaban cause at least the characters begin to have a life of their own, they're not just a motion version of the book,like the 2 first movies feel, andthey're not even good adaptations. they have gotten increasingly better, even if the latest one disappointed by falling flat at the end, as a fan I still love them even if they're far less than perfect and most of the time I'm sure non-fans don't understand a book,but with harry potter I'm afraid I take the stance of "if you haven't read the books, then it's your own fault if you don't understand" cause there's some many things to do, than waste time explaining plot or how something works or what is a character thinking seems like a waste.

recently, percy jackson was adapted. I admit, I had not heard of the series before it was adapted. but I have been reading it aand I really,really like it. the movie is fun, even if it is completely different and often feels like an AU version of the story, despite being directed by chris columbus it is still a pretty good movie, I thought.

another adaptation I love is Nick Hornby's "About A Boy" which strikes a great balance of adaptating a book, letting it find its own feet,while mixing two stories and using voice overs. it's a film I've seen a billion times, since it's on tv all the time and I don't grow tired of it. the film cuts a few thins I would've liked to see but mantains the integrity of the story and the spirit of the characters and lets them be the same story while standing on its own.

The Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy is a similar story to Percy Jackson. I honestly like the movie, it's charming and its got great casting, but it's the kind where it's not so much an adaptation as it is an AU, a retelling perhaps of the story, like the same characters but in something not-quite-unlike the original.

what I look for in a adaptation is that the film is enjoyable, that it has its own spirit, that it can stand on its own while keeping respect for the original, not to turn the characters OOC and completely change the story and the meaning or on the other hand, to change nothing and be a boring carbon copy.
carbon copy examples: watchmen, vanilla sky, they're simply put, boring. watchmen has a few redeeming moments and it is at least visually impressive. vanilla sky makes you want to go to sleep
[Error: unknown template qotd]

Oh, that's easy.
Good Omens by Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman.
I love this book, it's hilarious and adorable and it has a a little something for everyone. it has romance and action and horror and the end of the world and children's adventures and all in a wonderful language that makes you laugh and cry and you never want to finish the book.
I've begun to read "On being a photographer" by David Hurn. It's very good,I've really enjoyed it so far.

And I'm happy,I guess, to see it confirms much of what I've learned in the last few years.

I've only begun to take photography seriously in the last 3 or 4 years.
I've always liked it, I've always been the kid with the camera. I've also found this annoys some people. I don't know why. they certainly want to see the photos later.

well, a few weeks ago I got some photos developed,one of my few colour films and I really liked the result. It had some pretty decent shots.
compared with another series I shot a couple of years ago it was much much better. It made me feel quite proud.

As I read this book,I'm just on the first chapter, selecting a subject and I've discovered some things on my own, like not getting in over your head and be specific. Though I did learn doing school papers. or about having an idea of what to shoot, not just wandering around waiting for something,since I've done that and with luck you get a couple of photos out of it. having a idea helps,and it doesn't have to be restrictive.Choose a theme or a place and start from here.
It makes me feel good,I guess, that in all this time I've actually learned some things. (BTW,I really need a scanner for the many,many rolls of films I've got just sitting under my bed)

And I can see how useful this book is, since it's offering good advice like writing a list about subjects you like and asking yourself questions such as "is it visual?", "is it practical?", "is it interesting?" I've taken several photography classes and they all focus on the camera, on how it works,how it was created, on how to develop film,on what to do or not do, one teacher talked to us a little about composition but no one's ever talked about process, about what this guy is talking about.

Anyway, I'm really enjoying this book. I reccomend it.

Powered by ScribeFire.

January 2013

678910 1112


RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 22nd, 2017 11:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios